Court slaps Hello Kitty for stealing bunny

Sanrio has lost a cut of the oh-so-lucrative Benelux market (that’s Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg, FYI). A Dutch court has ruled that

a minimalist rabbit character dreamed up by Sanrio Co., the Tokyo-based parent company of the Hello Kitty empire, infringes on the rights of her arch-nemesis, Miffy.

Do you love the idea that Kitty has an arch-nemesis as much as I do? A peremptory inspection of the characters appears to support the court’s decision. Given how generic they both look it’s hard for me to believe anyone deserves a copyright here. I mean how many ways are there to draw a cartoon bunny anyway?

Oh, shut up Groening.

Advertisement

Hen thinks it is a penguin or, when life imitates Wallace & Gromit

It’s almost August and that means the papers are filled with stories of animals as media silly season descends upon us. Nowhere is this more true than Metro UK which this week has already run stories on the bear who broke into a house and “stole” a teddy bear and another of a bear who put a safety cone on its head. This last story ran only because someone came up with the headline Cone and the barbearian. In today’s edition we have the breaking news of a Chinese hen who walks like a penguin.

While some may think of this as cute, in reality it is just another case of outrageous copyright infringement by the Chinese. Clearly they have trained this fowl to play the Feathers McGraw role in a horrible live-action rip-off of the classic Wallace & Gromit short “The Wrong Trousers.”

I shall recap the salient plot points for those of you poor pathetic souls who have not yet seen it (but I’m not speaking to you until you correct this error): Wallace rents a room out to a penguin. After displacing Gromit, the penguin is then revealed to be the nefarious bank robber Feathers McGraw. McGraw is a brilliant master of disguise who uses a red rubber glove to transform himself into a chicken (nudge, nudge) when he pulls off his heists. I won’t tell you anymore but I will say that the closing chase scene – involving a toy train set – is (really) one of the best and funniest things I’ve ever seen.

Extra kudos to the W&G site for having the best competition I’ve seen in a while. “TOP BUN The best Wallace & Gromit-themed baked good uploaded to the site each month will win a set of Wallace & Gromit baking kits.” I believe they mean best picture, either that or they’ve figured out some super cool new technology.

“Smartbook Says Bloggers Can’t Use The Word Smartbook Anymore. Smartbook.”

I really can’t top that TechCrunch headline.

For most of us, the term ’smartbook’ (a device that’s somewhere in between a smartphone and a netbook) is nothing but the latest tech buzzword du jour. For German company Smartbook, however, it’s apparently a chance to score some free publicity by vigilantly defending a multinational trademark and threatening to sue everyone who dares use it in conversations.

Smartbook AG has also targeted media outlets who use the word generically to describe some next-generation devices. For instance, electronics industry newspaper EE Times has removed all references to the word, and even downright deleted an article that dealt with the legal threats put forward by Smartbook against the media company…Now it appears the company is actively going to pursue international bloggers and press too, no longer limiting themselves to those in German-speaking countries.

There’s a very technical marketing word to describe this situation: FAILURE.

Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook. Smartbook.   

Penguins of Irony visit Beijing: Chinese government prosecutes a copyright infringement case!

They’re upset that satirists are doing naughty things to the Olympic rings and other symbols of the 2008 Munich — er Beijing — Olympiad.

“It’s a rights violation that contravenes our country’s laws and regulations,” an unnamed  spokesman said in a statement on The Beijing Organising Committee for the 2008 Olympic Games’ Web site.

China has laws and regulations? Wow. Learn something new everyday.